Risk Assessments Are Only the Beginning: The Importance of Following Through

Many organizations devote significant time and resources to conducting security risk assessments. While identifying vulnerabilities is an important first step, recent guidance from federal regulators serves as a reminder that finding risks is only part of the process. Organizations must also take meaningful action to address the risks they uncover.

Assessment Without Remediation Is Not Enough

Federal regulators continue to emphasize that an effective security program requires more than documenting vulnerabilities. Once risks are identified, employers and service providers should develop and implement plans to reduce those risks to an appropriate level. A risk assessment that sits on a shelf without corresponding remediation efforts may provide little protection against cyber threats and could create challenges during a regulatory review following a security incident.

One common issue identified by regulators is that organizations often recognize security weaknesses but delay corrective action until after a breach occurs. Examples of commonly deferred safeguards include strengthening authentication controls, improving system monitoring, enhancing access controls, and increasing visibility into network activity. In many cases, these safeguards are implemented only after an incident exposes the vulnerability.

Security Is an Ongoing Process

Another important lesson from regulatory guidance is that security is not a one-time project. Technology environments, threats, and business operations continually evolve. Security controls that were appropriate several years ago may no longer provide adequate protection today. Regular reviews of security measures help ensure that safeguards remain effective as risks change over time.

Documentation Matters During Reviews

Documentation is equally important. During audits, investigations, or security reviews, organizations may be asked to demonstrate not only that policies exist, but also that controls have actually been implemented. Evidence such as project plans, approvals, training records, system configurations, meeting notes, testing results, and monitoring reports can help demonstrate that security measures are operating as intended.

For HR and benefits professionals, this serves as an important reminder that protecting employee information involves more than having written policies. Whether managing benefits platforms, payroll systems, enrollment tools, or other employee data systems, organizations should regularly evaluate identified risks, implement corrective measures, and maintain documentation showing that those safeguards are actively in place.

BAS takes the security of the MyEnroll360 platform seriously, conducting ongoing assessments and maintaining documented controls to protect the employee data entrusted to us. For questions about MyEnroll360 security practices, contact your BAS account manager.